O. Yashchuk, student
Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv, Kyiv, Ukraine
DOI: https://doi.org/10.17721/1728-2640.2017.135.4.17
THE IDEA OF THE SUPREME AUTHORITY IN THE BELARUSIAN-LITHUANIAN CHRONICLES THROUGH A PRISM OF RULER'S TITLES
The article is devoted to the problem of representations of supreme power in the Belarusian-Lithuanian chronicles through a prism of the ruler’s titles. The author analyzed the first code of the Belarusian-Lithuanian chronicles, that containing the "Chronicler of the Grand Dukes of Lithuania", the second code, that containing the "Chronicle of the Grand Duchy of Lithuania", and the third code ("The Chronicle of BichovetsThe Bychowiec Chronicle"). It was found that for the analyzed period there is no established standardized formula for the ruler's titles. However, in the study of the structure of titles found that the most stable formulation of the title in all code of the Belarusian-Lithuanian chronicles is the title "Grand Duke". It is revealed that the system of representations of supreme power changes after coronation. Investigated the use of the title "hospodar", "pan" and "hospodyn" in the Belarusian-Lithuanian chronicles. Investigated the use of the title "kniazha" which at the same time is the designation of the son of the ruler and representatives of the supreme aristocracy of princely descent.
Keywords: idea, supreme authority, title, grand duke, Grand Duchy of Lithuania, Belarusian-Lithuanian chronicles.
Full text PDF
References
1. Akt Krewskai unii 1385. (2010) In: Vialikae knyastva Litowskae. Encyklapedyia. Minsk: BelEn. Vol. 3, 424-425.
2. ANTONOVYCH, V.B. (1995) Ocherk istorii Velikogo kniazhestva Litovskogo do smerti velikogo knyazya Olgerda. In: Antonovych, V.B. Moia spovid: Vybrani istorychni ta publitsystychni tvory. Kyiv: Lybid, 622-743.
3. ANON (1893) Arxiv Yugo-Zapadnoj Rossii. Vol. VIII. Ch. I Kyiv.
4. Bulyka A.M. (1986) Histarychny slownik belaruskai movy. Minsk: «Navuka i tekhnika». Vol 7.
5. HRYCKEVICH, A. (2006) Knyazhaty. In: Vyalikae knyastva Litowskae. Encyklapedyia. Minsk: BelEn. Vol. 2, 114.
6. HRYCKEVICH, A. (2006) Yawnut. In: Vyalikae knyastva Litowskae. Encyklapedyia. Minsk: BelEn. Vol. 2, 786.
7. KARSKIJ, E.F. (1962) O yazyke tak nazyvaemykh litovskikh letopisej. In: Karskii E.F. Trudy po belorusskomu i druhim slavianskim yazykam. Moscow: Izdatelstvo AN SSSR.
8. Letopis Arkheolohicheskoho obshchestva (1980) In: Polnoe sobranie russkikh letopysej. Moscow: Izdatelstvo «Nauka». Vol. XXXV, 91-102.
9. Letopis Krasinskoho (1980) In: Polnoe sobranie russkikh letopysej. Moscow: Izdatelstvo «Nauka». Vol. XXXV, 128-144.
10. Rumiancevskaia letopis (1980) In: Polnoe sobranie russkikh letopysej. Moscow: Izdatelstvo «Nauka». Vol. XXXV, 193-213.
11. STAROSTINA I.P. (1991) Sudebnik Kazimira 1468. In: Drevnejshye hosudarstva na territorii SSSR. Materialy i issledovaniya, 1988-1989 hh. Moscow: Izdatelstvo «Nauka».
12. Statuty Velykoho kniazivstva Lytovskoho (2002). Odesa: Yurydychna literatura. Vol I.
13. Supraslskaya letopis (1980) In: Polnoe sobranie russkikh letopysej. Moscow: Izdatelstvo «Nauka». Vol. XXXV, 36-67.
14. TYMOVSKIJ, M.; KENEVICH, Ya.; XOLCER, E. (2004) Istoriya Pol’shy Moscow: Izdatelstvo «Ves Mir».
15. Khronika Bykhovca (1975) In: Polnoe sobranie russkikh letopysej. Moscow: Izdatelstvo «Nauka». Vol. XXXII, 128-173.
16. CHAMIARYCKI, V.A. (1969) Belaruskiya letapisy yak pomniki litaratury. Uzniknenne i litaraturnaya historyya pershyx zvodaw. Minsk.
17. KIAUPIENĖ, J. (2005) Swoistość systemu prawno-ustrojowego Wielkiego Księstwa Litewskiego w XV-XVI wieku. In: Europa Środkowowschodnia od X do XVIII wieku – jedność czy różnorodność. Kraków, 63–67.
18. Origo regis Jagyelo et Wytholdi ducum Lithuanie (1980) In: Polnoe sobranie russkikh letopysej. Moscow: Izdatelstvo «Nauka». Vol. XXXV, 115-117.
19. STADNICKI, K. (1881) Synowie Gedymina, wielko-władcy Litwy: Monwid – Narymunt – Jewnuta – Koriat. Lwów.
20. WOLFF, J. (1895) Kniaziowie litewsko-ruscy od końca czternastego wieku. Warszawa.
21. ZAKRZEWSKI, A. (2013) Wielkie Księstwo Litewskie (XVI–XVIII w.). Prawo – ustrój – społeczeństwo. Warszawa: Campidoglio.