O. Kotliar,
Master’s student,
Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv, Kyiv, Ukraine
ORCID: 0000-0002-2653-0443
DOI: https://doi.org/10.17721/1728-2640.2022.152-153.3
METHODOLOGICAL PRINCIPLES OF AMERICAN FOREIGN POLICY TRADITIONS STUDY: INTELLECTUAL HISTORY OPPORTUNITIES
In the article, the author analyzed methods and approaches of intellectual history basing on the evolution of American foreign policy thought study. The research was done from its origins in the religious myths of the first Puritan colonists, evolution into the concepts of the U.S. special place and role in the world, to formalization into political doctrines and practical implementation. The relevance of the topic is due to modern transformations in the world political environment and changes in the balance of power in the international arena. It creates challenges for modern leading countries. The issue is especially acute for the United States because of the contestation of their superpower status by new regional leaders.
The methodological approaches of such intellectual historians as A. Lovejoy, K. Skinner, J. Pocock, P. Gordon, R. Chartier were considered. The research determined opportunities of interaction between the methods of contextual analysis, put forward by the Cambridge School, and other approaches to the text reading. Based on the practical application of these methods in the process of studying the foreign policy tradition of the United States, the following problems were emphasized: myth-making upon an attempt to trace the continuity of political ideas and identify their authorship, anachronisms, tendencies to define «unit-ideas» in history without reference to the context. An equally problematic issue is the possibility to «reconstruct» the process of forming an ideological tradition at all.
It was figured out how certain ideological constructs were borrowed by American political leaders and turned into concepts that form the core of the modern U.S. political ideology. Attention is focused on how, in the process of evolution, political concepts acquired recognition, propagation, and established in the political language of the country. It was concluded that this happened not only due to the ideological content inherent in earlier variations of concepts but also through new interpretations, during which the tradition was expanded with new discourses. An idea repeater thus plays a significant role – its interpretations fill the country's ideological apparatus, adapt ideologemes to the appropriate political context. This approach perfectly illustrates the process of the United States world's place finding, which formed the national ethos of Americans and still shapes the priorities of U.S. foreign policy.
Keywords: intellectual history, U.S. foreign policy tradition, American ideology, Cambridge School, contextual approach, political language, intersubjectivity, «American Century».
Submitted: 10.01.2022
Download Full Text
References:
1. Atnashev, T., Velizhev, M. (2015). «Conteхt is king»: John Pocock is a Historian of Political Languages, New literary review, 4, 21–44. [In Russian].
2. Berkhofer, R. (1997). Beyond the Great Story: History as Text and Discourse. Massachusetts: Harvard University Press. [In English].
3. Baudrillard, J. (2000). America. Vladimir Dal. https://royallib.com/read/bodriyyar_gan/amerika.html#0 [In Russian].
4. Bryan, W. (1899). Republic or empire: the Philippine question. Georgia: Occidental Publishing Company. [In English].
5. Fevr, L. (1994). Fights for History. Moscow: Nauka. [In Russian].
6. Ghasemi, M. (2014). Revisiting History in Hayden White’s Philosophy. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/2158244014542585 [In English].
7. Gordon, P. (2012). What is Intellectual History? A frankly partisan introduction to a frequently misunderstood field, Revised Spring. [In English].
8. Gorman, A. (2021). The Hill We Climb, Haaretz. https://www.haaretz.com/us-news/read-the-full-text-of-amanda-gorman-s-inaugural-poem-1.9471743 [In English].
9. Inaugural Address of James Knox Polk 1845. The Avalon Project. https://avalon.law.yale.edu/19th_century/polk.asp [In English].
10. Kelley, D. (2017). The Descent of Ideas: The History of Intellectual History. London & New York: Routledge. [In English].
11. Konnerton, P. (2013). How Societies Remember. Kyiv: Nika-Tsentr. [In Ukrainian].
12. Lavdzhoy, A. (2001). The Great Chain of Being. Moscow: House of Intellectual Books. http://psylib.org.ua/books/lovejoy/index.htm [In Russian].
13. Lippmann, W. (2020). Men of Destiny. London: Routledge. [In English].
14. Lodge, H. (1919). Treaty of Peace with Germany: Speech of Hon. Henry Cabot Lodge of Massachusetts in the Senate of the United States. Washington: Government Printing Office [In English].
15. Luce, H. (1941). The American Century, Life 17 February 1941, 61–65. [In English].
16. Miller, P. (1974). Nature's Nation. Massachusetts: Harvard University Press, 1974. [In English].
17. Ninkovich, F. (1994). Modernity and Power: A History of the Domino Theory in the Twentieth Century. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. [In English].
18. O’Sullivan, J. (1945). Annexation, The United States Magazine and Democratic Review, 17, 3–10. [In English].
19. Pocock, J. (1989). Politics, Language, and Time: Essays on Political Thought and History. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. [In English].
20. Porshneva, O. (2006). Prospects for interdisciplinarity in the context of intellectual history contemporary orientations, Imagines Mundi: Almanac Research General History of the XVI-XX centuries, 4, 10–24. Ekaterinburg: Izdatelstvo Uralskogo universiteta. [In Russian].
21. Repina, L. (2008). The Contexts of Intellectual History, Dialogue with Time, 25, 10–24. [In Russian].
22. Roosevelt, T. (1990). The Strenuous Life. Essays and Addresses. Colorado: The Century Co. https://www.bartleby.com/58/. [In English].
23. Second Inaugural Address of William McKinley 1901. The Avalon Project. https://avalon.law.yale.edu/19th_century/mckin2.asp [In English].
24. Sharte, R. (2004). Intellectual History and the History of Mentalities: a Double Reappraisal? Magazine Hall. https://magazines.gorky.media/nlo/2004/2/intellektualnaya-istoriya-i-istoriya-mentalnostej-dvojnaya-pereoczenka.html [In Russian].
25. Skinner, Q. (1969). Meaning and Understanding in the History of Ideas, History and Theory, Vol. 8, № 1. [In English].
26. Stephanson, A. (1996). Manifest Destiny: American Expansion and the Empire of Right (Hill and Wang Critical Issues). New York: Hill and Wang Critical Issues. [In English].
27. Washington's Farewell Address 1796. The Avalon Project. Documents in Law, History and Diplomacy. https://avalon.law.yale.edu/18th_century/washing.asp [In English].
28. Washington's Inaugural Speech of 1789. National Archives and Records Administration. https://www.archives.gov/exhibits/american_originals/inaugtxt.html [In English].
29. Winthrop, J. (1838). A Modell of Christian Charity (1630), Collections of the Massachusetts Historical Society. https://history.hanover.edu/texts/winthmod.html [In English].