K. Baulina, PhD Student
Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv, Kyiv, Ukraine
DOI: https://doi.org/10.17721/1728-2640.2021.148.3
REFLECTION AND RECTIFICATION OF THE SACRAL PALACE CEREMONIAL "PROSKYNESIS" AT THE COURT OF THE ASSYRIAN AND ACHAEMENID RULERS
The palace ceremonial "proskynesis" (gr. – προσκύνησις) – which consisted of a kiss and a bow – was considered and interpreted. A comparison of ancient Eastern traditions at the royal court of Assyrian and Achaemenid rulers is highlighted. The author tries to reconstruct the essence and meaning of proskynesis in the lives of kings and ordinary people. The work uses ancient greek written sources and the eastern source heritage, which is represented by reliefs and obelisks from Assyria and the Achaemenid Empire.
The pertinence of the topic is an attempt to interpret part of the palace ceremony – proskynesis, and to highlight the royal cult of the ancient Eastern traditions at the court of Achaemenid empire. The purpose of the project is to determine some points in the ceremonial proskynesis, as a reflection of the sacred status of the ruler or as an element of court etiquette.
The tradition of the sacralization of royal power was inherent in virtually all the ancient eastern people, but the concrete forms of this sacralization in different states could differ significantly from one another and not always included the "adorable" of the monarch. This ritual from the Persians borrowed from different countries was meant to mean the king's majesty. With his adoration, the ritual had nothing in common. Kings were considered to be the favorites of the gods, their pious choirs and priests.
The range of postures to which proskynesis was applied is diverse, and therefore we have to make out the idea which gesture proskynesis can be consist off and we have to interpret this in several different ways, depending on its context, with possibilities ranging between "sending a kiss forward", kneeling down, prostrating oneself, or just a bow. And at all we need to determine is the proskynesis equal to prostration?
Keywords: proskynesis, palace ceremony, sacralization, royal cult, king's court, Assyria, Achaemenid Empire.
Submitted: 15.02.2021
Download Full Text
References:
1. Art News of the Year: An Assyrian Relief of Tiglath-Pileser III. (1950). Art News, 49(7), 199.
2. Ascalone, E. (2007). Mesopotamia: Assyrians, Sumerians, Babylonians. Berkeley: University of California Press.
3. Bikerman, E. (1963). À propos d'un passage de Chares de Mytilène. La Parola del Passato, 91, 241–255.
4. British Museum. Department of Egyptian and Assyrian Antiquities. A guide to the Babylonian and Assyrian Antiquities. (1900). London: Trustees.
5. Cohen, A. (2010). Assyrian Reliefs from the Palace of Ashurnasirpal II: A Cultural Biography. Hanover: University Press of New England.
6. Doroodi, M. (2019). DNf: A New Inscription Emerges from the Shadow. ARTA. URL: http://www.achemenet.com/pdf/arta/ARTA_2019.001_Delshad_Doroodi.pdf.
7. Frye, R. N. (1993). The Heritage of Persia. Costa Mesa, California: Mazda.
8. Garrison, M. (2011). By the Favor of Auramazdā: Kingship and the Divine in the Early Achaemenid Period. In P. P. Iossif, A. D. Chankowski, C. C. Lorber (Eds.), More than Men, Less than Gods: Studies on Royal Cult and Imperial Worship: Proceedings of the International Colloquium Organized by the Belgian School at Athens. Leuven: Peeters. Pp. 15-104.
9. Hachmann, R. (1995). Die Völkerschaften auf den Bildwerken von Persepolis. In U. Finkbeiner, R. Dit-tmann, H. Hauptmann (Eds.), Beiträge zur Kulturgeschichte Vorderasiens: Festschrift für Rainer Michael Boehmer. Mainz: Verlag Philipp von Zabern. S. 195–223.
10. Kuan, J. K. (2016). Neo-Assyrian Historical Inscriptions and Syria-Palestine: Israelite/Judean-Tyrian-Damascene Political and Commercial Relations in the Ninth-Eighth Centuries BCE. Eugene, Oregon: Wipf and Stock.
11. Layard, A. H. (1849). The Monuments of Nineveh, from Drawings Made on the Spot. London: John Murray.
12. Layard, A. H. (1851). Inscription in the Cueniform Charachter, from Assyrian Monuments. London: Harrison and son.
13. Lecoq, P. (1997). Les inscriptions de la Perse achéménide. Paris: Gallimard.
14. Porter, B. N. (1995). Language, Audience and Impact in Imperial Assyria. Israel Oriental Studies, 15, 51-72.
15. Root, M. C. (1979). The King and Kingship in Achaemenid Art. Essays in the Creation of an Iconography of Empire. Leiden: Diffusion.
16. Rung, E. (2019). The Proskynesis at the Achaemenid Royal Court: A New Evidence. CA 2019. 15th Congress of the Fédération internationale des associations d'études classiques / Classical Association annual conference 2019. Institute of Education & Senate House. London, Thursday 4 July – Monday 8 July 2019. Panel Abstracts. London. Pp. 14-15.
17. Stronach, D. (1978). Pasargadae: a Report on the Excavations Conducted by the British Institute of Persian Studies from 1961 to 1963. New York: Clarendon Press.
18. Schachermeyr, F. (1949). Alexander der Grosse: Ingenium und Macht. Graz: A. Pustet.
19. Lenfant, D. (2004). Ctesias de Cnide. La Perse. L'Inde. Autre Fragments. Paris: Les Belles Lettres.
20. Herodotus. (1972). History. Leningrad: Science. [in Russian].
21. Xenophon. (1976). Cyropaedia. Moscow: Science. [in Russian].
22. Melikov, R. (2013). Ancient Persian Inscriptions. Transliteration, Translation, Glossary. Baku: Wast-West. [in Russian].
23. Strabo. (1994). Geography. Moscow: Ladomir. [in Russian].