K. Valentyrova, PhD student
Taras Shevchenko National University of Kiyv, Kyiv, Ukraine
ORCID: 0000-0002-5213-8218
DOI: https://doi.org/10.17721/1728-2640.2020.144.2
SCIENTIFIC STUDY OF MEDIEVAL EDGED WEAPONS: A HISTORIOGRAPHY
The history of scientific study of medieval edged weapons dates back over 200 years. During this time a lot of information has been accumulated and this knowledge is a necessary basis for further research. However, the methods and approaches by which that data was obtained deserve special attention. Traditions to collect ancient artifacts significantly influenced the formation of scientific interest in bladed weapons. The first attempts to analyze the material were related the need to catalog it. For the 19th century, we can talk about different scientific works in which the main or significant attention was paid to edged weapons. Shaping of approaches to the study of ancient weapons which are central today developed gradually. Standards of description of items, typology, and technology and material analysis, studying of artifacts in a broad cultural context became the main vectors of work with medieval edged weapon. At the turn of the 20th – 21st centuries development of chemical and physical sciences, the complication of the methodological apparatus and the accumulation of archaeological material narrowly focused works built on in-depth analysis of small groups of artifacts and use of specific research methods. The interdisciplinary approach, which involves the research of one problem by specialists in different fields of science, has taken a significant place in the edged weapon studying. Thus, the further development of the classical approaches, combined with the new ones emerging at the boundaries of the disciplines, opens up new opportunities for gaining the most accurate knowledge about past through the study of blade weapons.
Like any part of the past, blade weapons as a source can be perceived by the researcher entirely subjectively, so it is important to understand the limits of this perception and the accents it provides. The analysis of the process of formation of research strategies and methods which widely used today makes it possible to determine further optimal ways of their development. As well as it allows assuming which previously obtained ideas and assertion require verification.
Key words: Middle Ages, edged weapon, historiography, method, approach.
Received by the editorial board: 02.03.2020
Download Full Text
References:
1. Arcixovskij, A. (1944). Old Russian Miniatures as a Historical Source. Moscow: Moscow State University Press. [In Russian].
2. Arcixovskij, A. (1946). Russian Arms of the 10th – 13th Centuries. Papers and Reports of the Faculty of History of Moscow State University, 4, 3-17. [In Russian].
3. Berton, R. (2008). Book of Swords. Moscow: Central Polygraph. [In Russian].
4. Bexajm, B. (2008). Encyclopedia of Arms. Saint Petersburg: Orchestra. [In Russian].
5. Zhil’, F. (1860). Museum of Arms Collection in Tsarskoye Selo. Saint Petersburg: A. Bauman’s Publishing. [In Russian].
6. Kirpichnikov, A. (1966). Old Russian Arms. Swords and Sabers of the 9th – 13th Centuries. Leningrad: Science. [In Russian].
7. Kirpichnikov, A. (1998). About the Beginning of the Production of Swords in Rus. Collection of Works of the 6th International Congress for the Archaeology of Slavs, 4, 246-251. [In Russian].
8. Kolchin, B. (1953). Ferrous Metallurgy and Metalworking in Old Rus (Pre-Mongol Period). Moscow: Academy of Sciences of USSR Publishing. [In Russian].
9. Lenc, E. (1908). Index of Medieval and Renaissance Department. Collection of Arms. Saint Petersburg: Imperial Heritage Museum. [In Russian].
10. Musin, A. (2005). Milites Christi of the Old Rus. The Military Culture of the Russian Middle Ages in the Context of a Religious Worldview. Saint Petersburg: Oriental Studies. [In Russian].
11. Oakeshott, E. (2004). The Archaeology of Weapons. Moscow: Central Polygraph. [In Russian].
12. Peterson, Ya. (2005). Norwegian Swords of Viking Era. Saint Petersburg: Alphared. [In Russian].
13. Petrakov, T. (2016). The History of the Research on Weapons Technology Production in Old Rus. Unpublished Thesis (PhD in History). S. I. Vavilov Institute for the History of Science and Technology of the Russian Academy of Sciences. [In Russian].
14. Baran, V. et al. (1994). 60 Years of the Institute of Archaeology of the National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine. Kyiv: Kyiv Academy of Eurobusiness. [In Ukrainian].
15. Ashdown, C. (1925). Armour & weapons in the middle ages. London: Harrap.
16. Boeheim, W. (1890). Handbuch der Waffenkunde. Das Waffenwesen in seiner historischen Entwickelung vom Beginn des Mittelalters bis zum Ende des 18. Jahrhunderts. Leipzig: Verlag von E. A. Seemann.
17. Boutell, C. (1893). Arms and armour in antiquity and the Middle Ages: also a descriptive notice of modern weapons. London: Reeves and Turner.
18. Bruhn-Hoffmeyer, A. (1963). From Mediaeval Sword to the Renaissance Rapier. Gladius, 2, 5-39.
19. Bruhn-Hoffmeyer, A. (1954). Middelalderens tveæggede sværd. Vol. I. København: København Tøjhusmuseet.
20. Bruhn-Hoffmeyer, A. (1954). Middelalderens tveæggede sværd. Vol. II. København: København Tøjhusmuseet.
21. Burton, R. (1884). Book of the Sword. London: Chatto and Windus.
22. Demmin, A. (1877). An illustrated history of Arms and Armour from the earliest period to the present time. London: Georg Bell & Sons.
23. Fairholt, F. (1896). Costume in England: a history of dress to the end of eighteenth century. London: John Wiley and Sons.
24. Ffoulkes, C. (1912). The Armourer and His Craft from the 11th to the 15th Century. London: Methuen & Co LTD.
25. Geibig, A. (1989). Zur Formenvielfalt der Schwerter und Schwertfragmente von Haithabu. Offa. Berichte und Metteilungen zur Urgeschichte, Frügeschichte und Mittelalterarchäologie, 46, 223-268.
26. Glosek, M. (1984). Miesze srodkowoeuropejskie z X-XV w. Warczawa: Wydawnictwo Geologiczne.
27. Glosek, M. (1973). Znaki i napisy na mieczach sredniowieczniech w Polsce. Wroclaw: Widawnictwo Polskiej Academii Nauk.
28. Glosek, M. & Nadolski, A. (1970). Miecze sredniowiecznie z ziem polskich. Lodz: Acta Archaeologica Lodziensia.
29. Goranov, A. (n. d.). The Bruhn-Hoffmeyer Typology of Medieval Swords. My Armoury. URL: http://myarmoury.com/feature_hoffmeyer.html.
30. Hewitt, J. (1855). Ancient Armour and Weapons in Europe: from the Iron period of the Northern Nation to the end of the seventeenth century. Vol. I. London and Oxford: John Genry and James Parker.
31. Hewitt, J. (1855). Ancient Armour and Weapons in Europe: from the Iron period of the Northern Nation to the end of the seventeenth century. Vol. II. London and Oxford: John Genry and James Parker.
32. Hewitt, J. (1855). Ancient Armour and Weapons in Europe: from the Iron period of the Northern Nation to the end of the seventeenth century. Vol. III. London and Oxford: John Genry and James Parker.
33. Hewitt, J. (1855). Ancient Armour and weapons in Europe: From the Iron Period of the Northern Nations to the End of the seventeenth Century. Oxford and London, J. Henry and J. Parker.
34. Jakobsson, M. (1922). Krigarideologi och vikingatida svärdstypologi. Stockholm: Stockholms Universitet.
35. Laking, F. (1920). A Record of European Armour and Arms through seven centuries. Vol. I. London: G. Bell and Sons.
36. Laking, F. (1920). A Record of European Armour and Arms through seven centuries. Vol. II. London: G. Bell and Sons.
37. Laking, F. (1920). A Record of European Armour and Arms through seven centuries. Vol. III. London: G. Bell and Sons.
38. Laking, F. (1920). A Record of European Armour and Arms through seven centuries. Vol. IV. London: G. Bell and Sons.
39. Laking, F. (1920). A Record of European Armour and Arms through seven centuries. Vol. V. London: G. Bell and Sons.
40. Lawrinowizc, O. (2005). Tresci ideowe broni rycerskiej w Polsce wiekow srednich. Lodz: Acta Archaeologica Lodziensia.
41. Mäder, S. (2001). Stähle, Steine und Schlangen. Zur kunst-, kultur- und technikgeschichtlichen Einordnung dreier Schwertklingen aus dem alamannischen Siedlungsraum: Dissertation zur Erlangung des Doktorgrades der Philosophie. Mäder – Berlin.
42. Malatesta, E. (2003). Armi Ed Armaioli D' Italia. Florence: Editoriale Olimpia S.p.A.
43. Maure, M. (1977). Les épées de l'époque viking – essai de classification typologique. Universitetets Oldsaksamling Årbok, 1975/1976, 95-116.
44. Meyrick, S. (1824). A critical inquiry into antient armour: as it existed in Europe, but particularly in England, from the Norman conquest to the reign of King Charles II, with a glossary of military terms of the middle ages; Vol. I. London: Printed for R. Jennings, sold by J. Gale.
45. Meyrick, S. (1824). A critical inquiry into antient armour: as it existed in Europe, but particularly in England, from the Norman conquest to the reign of King Charles II, with a glossary of military terms of the middle ages; Vol. II. London: Printed for R. Jennings, sold by J. Gale.
46. Meyrick, S. (1824). A critical inquiry into antient armour: as it existed in Europe, but particularly in England, from the Norman conquest to the reign of King Charles II, with a glossary of military terms of the middle ages; Vol. III. London: Printed for R. Jennings, sold by J. Gale.
47. Nagy, G. (1896). Magyar kardok. Budapest: [s. n.].
48. Oakeshott, E. (1991). Records of the Medieval Sword. Suffolk: Boydell Press.
49. Oakeshott, E. (1960). The Archaeology of Weapons: Arms and Armour from Prehistory to the Age of Chivalry. Suffolk: Boydell Press.
50. Oakeshott, E. (1998). The Sword in the Age of Chivalry. Woodbridge: The Boydell Press.
51. Veron, A. et al. (2012). Origin of Copper Used in Bronze Artifacts from Middle Bronze Age Burials in Sidon: a Synthesis from Lead Isotope Imprints and Chemical Analyses. Archaeology & History in the Lebanon, 34, 68-78.
52. Rhonde, F. (1932). Schmiedetechnik der wurmbunten Klingen des 8-9 jhts. ZWK, 4(13), 38-40.
53. Rupe, H. & Müller, F. (1916). Chemische und metallographische Untersuchungen prähistorischer Eisenfunde. Basel: Verhandlungen der naturforschenden Gesellschaft Basel.
54. Slivka, M. (2017). Inskripcie v stredovekom archeologickom materiáli z územia Slovenska I. Archaeologia historica, 42(2), 819-847. DOI: 10.5817/AH2017-2-20.
55. Slivka, M. Symbolika výzbroje a výstroja. Archaeologia historica: sborník příspěvků přednesených na 33. konferenci archeologů středověku České republiky a Slovenské republiky s hlavním zaměřením na hrady a jejich úlohu ve středověkém vojenství a osídlení. Brtnice a Panská Lhota 17.-21. září 2001. Brno: Muzejní a vlastivědná společnost v Brně, 2002. S. 589-605.