Issue 144 (2020)

M. Asanishvili, Master in History and Archeology

Independent Resercher

Vinnytsia, Ukraine

DOI: https://doi.org/10.17721/1728-2640.2020.144.1

SECONDARY EDUCATION OF THE 1920’s IN THE SOVIET PROVINCE

During the existence of the USSR, the Bolsheviks wanted to built a new class system in which workers would be the main social group. School in this context should have been included children to the adulthood from a young age. A tool of reeducation and breakdown of a child's life was a work. The reform of secondary education in the 1920s in the USSR meant the beginning of the cultural, social and economic dialogue of the Bolsheviks with their own commonwealth. This dialogue should to determine the further social development of the USSR. Teachers, local jurisdictions and children should become leaders of the dialogue.

The population of the USSR in the early 1920s was predominantly rural. That’s why children were in a traditional family. At such environment, the child didn’t have his own desires, dreams, free time, etc. Parents always involved children to the land work and housekeeping. The Bolsheviks' idea of a school, in which a child would acquire a profession and work, was met with strong resistance among the local population. In the villagers` outlook, the school had to give only reading and elementary grammar. Everything else for existence will be given by the land on which the child must look after. This caused a confrontation between Bolsheviks and local population and fit into the “one-to-one” scheme. Bolsheviks used repression, after the resistance to a unified labor school. Repression meant an attempt to subjugate the traditional population and educate a “new person”.

The “other-to-other” scheme also works with respect to the main actors in school life and power. Teachers, as the main leaders of the idea of unified labor school, had to bring up a "new person" locally. But in order to bring up a "new person", must understand what it is and have clear methods of education. The only thing that was clear to the teachers of the 1920s in the USSR – to use work as a tool of education at school. This is not surprising, because the person who chose the profession of а teacher, in the beginning of the Soviet Union, was not intended to educate the generation of communists, but to save their own lives, get benefits and wages, escape from the repression because of own past. That is why, a new generation of teachers consisted of "former" people, such as: White Guards, imperial officers, rich villagers and clergy. These people learned the Soviet language and successfully held posts at the school. It was convenient, but they couldn’t become the leaders of new ideas.

So, the project of unified labor school in the USSR in the early 1920s was probably a dialogue or a monologue of Soviet power to the population. School, as a tool of education, became a field of confrontation between different social groups.

Key words: "new person", Soviet province, educational reform, Soviet school, USSR, reform of the secondary education, unified labor school.

Received by the editorial board: 19.02.2020

References:

1. State Archive of Vinnitsa Region, Fund 842, List 1, File 94 (Profiles of Teachers of Labor Schools), 119 sheets.

2. State Archive of Vinnitsa Region, Fund 847, List 1, File 11 (Annual Reports, Work Plans of the Tulchinsky District Inspectorate of Public Education for 1923-1925), 423 sheets.

3. State Archive of Vinnitsa Region, Fund 254, List 1, File 105 (Materials, 2nd Zhmerinsky District Congress of Educators; 2nd Teachers' Cultural Conference. Report on District Teacher Training Courses in the Yampol Region), 55 sheets.

4. State Archive of Vinnitsa Region, Fund 824, List 4, File 1 (Decisions, Circulars of the All-Russian Central Executive Committee of the People's Commissariat of Education of the Ukrainian SSR. Minutes of Meetings of the Heads of County Departments of Public Education), 154 sheets.

5. State Archive of Vinnitsa Region, Fund 254, List 1, File 722 (Order of the Provincial Council on the Accounting of Historical Values and the Work of School Circles), 412 sheets.

6. Althusser, L. (2011). Ideology and Ideological State Apparatuses. Emergency Ration. https://bit.ly/2U6sN9p. [In Russian].

7. Berezivska, L. (2013). Educational Reforms: Mission, Reality, Reflection. Kyiv: Edelweiss. [In Ukrainian].

8. Bourdieu, P. (2005). Social Space: Field and Practice. Saint Petersburg: Aleteya. [In Russian].

9. All-Union Census of December 17, 1926: Summary. (1929). Issue 10: Population of the USSR by Occupation and Sectors of Economy. Moscow: Center for Statistics of the USSR. https://bit.ly/398QbY9. [In Russian].

10. Hohokhiia, N. (2015). Childhood in a Totalitarian Society: "Faithful Leninists" of Soviet Ukraine in the 1930’s. International Intellectual Journal «Ukraine is modern». http://uamoderna.com/md/gogokhia-childhood-ussr-1930s. [In Ukrainian].

11. Dimke, D. (2012). Soviet Children’s Games: Between Utopia and Reality. Anthropological Forum, 16, 24. [In Russian].

12. Dewey, J. (1900). The School and Society. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press. [In English].

13. Etkind, A. (2013). Internal Colonization: Russia’s Imperial Experience. Moscow: New Literary Review. [In Russian].

14. Masenko, L. (2017). The Language of Soviet Totalitarianism. Kyiv: Clio. [In Ukrainian].

15. About the Unified Labor School of the Russian Socialist Federative Soviet Republic. News of the All-Russian Central Executive Committee of Soviets. http://istmat.info/node/31601. [In Russian].

16. Panachin, F. et al. (1988). Essays on the History of School and Pedagogical Thought of the Soviet Peoples: 1941-1961. Moscow: Pedagogics. [In Russian].

17. Hamretskyi, I. (2006). History Rehab: in Twenty-seven Volumes. Vinnytsa Region. Book 1. Vinnytsa: DKF. [In Ukrainian].

18. Rozhkov, A. (2014). Among Peers: The Life World of a Young Man in Soviet Russia in the 1920’s. Moscow: New Literary Review. [In Russian].

19. Starodubov, A. (2001). Notes of an Eyewitness: Yekaterinoslav of 1918-1923. Center for the Study of Ego-documents. https://prozhito.org/person/316. [In Russian].

20. Fitzpatrick, S. (2011). Tear Off the Masks! Identity and Imposture in the Twentieth-Century Russia. Moscow: Russian Political Encyclopedia. [In Russian].